Steve Atkins wrote:
On Nov 13, 2006, at 1:36 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
Steve Atkins wrote:
2. Someone else is sending mail with my domain in RFC822 From:
Well, I believe the list is wrong, however it isn't my list,
it's the list in dkim-ssp-requirements-02.
4.1. Problem Scenario 1: All Mail Signed with DKIM
4.2. Problem Scenario 2: Illegitimate Domain Name Use
4.3. Problem Scenario 3: Domain Sends No Mail
Perhaps you could read the draft, and clarify if I've misunderstood
something.
As the person who wrote 4.2, it definitely does not correspond to
your #2. I'm somewhat at a loss as to how you could have interpreted
it that way.
It's a (one-line, hence possibly open to misinterpretation) summary of
the situation described in the first paragraph of 4.2.
I hope you're not misunderstanding me because I really don't understand
how you could have thought this had to do with third party signing. This
scenario is #1 with some expectation on the part of the signer that it ought
to arrive with signature intact. Can you tell me what led you to believe
that
it had to do with 3rd party signing? If there's something misleading, I'd
like to fix it.
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html