ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Blocking improperly signed messages

2006-12-14 12:07:03

On Dec 14, 2006, at 10:39 AM, Frank Ellermann wrote:

Steve Atkins wrote:

There seems to be some belief that if SSP does exactly the
same thing as SPF then we'll pull the phishing-proof, spam-
resistant mail architecture out of the hat this time.

A lousy chance based on PRA (SenderID).  Zero chance based on
2822-From, the concept makes no sense, it's incompatible with
tons of special cases with PRA != 2822-From.

So, to summarize, you believe that SSP is drastically less likely
to provide any operational benefit or achieve widespread
deployment than SPF?

Cheers,
  Steve

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>