Yes, see my other note that crossed in the mail. I left off a sentence.
And "last line of the body" is definitely more correct.
Tony
Charles Lindsey wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 04:50:07 -0000, Tony Hansen <tony(_at_)att(_dot_)com>
wrote:
Point 7:
Another way of expressing this algorithm that people may find
easier to understand is:
"If the last line of the message does not end with CRLF, CRLF is
added. Then, CRLF 0*CRLF is reduced to a single CRLF."
Well that would be better expressed as "1*CRLF is reduced to a single
CRLF",
but you should be saying "If the last line of the body" rather than "If
the last line of the message", because
------------------
Last-Header: foobarCRLF
CRLF
------------------
is a message with an empty body (read RFC 2822).
Or put it another way; the last line of what you hash MUST NEVER be
empty (i.e. must never consist of CRLF with no preceding real text).
That was why I included my INFORMATIVE NOTE, just to remove any possible
misinteroretations (and we have just seen how easily people misinterpret
things :-( ).
--Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own
thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131
Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk Snail: 5 Clerewood
Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB
A5
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according
tohttp://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html