Re: [Fwd: Re: [ietf-dkim] canonicalized null body and dkim]

Michael Thomas wrote:
> > Two lines of argument.  You were invoking the 'installed base' 
> > argument and I was noting that it is not valid to use that, at this 
> > stage, for this type of issue.
> No I was not. 

ok.  sorry I misread it to mean that.

d/

--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html