Paul Hoffman wrote:
maybe Eric could still do a s/LWSP/[FWS]/g in AUTH48
eliminating LWSP everywhere (?)
Absolutely not. This is a technical change.
It's IMO more in the direction of an erratum. Nobody
could claim with a straight face that they need lines
consisting only of white space for their folding magic.
If we tried that, the document would have to go through
IESG review again.
I thought that this depends on the AD or the shepherd (?)
Of course I don't want a new IESG review or other delays.
Frank
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html