Mark Delany wrote:
Why not? What's the rush? DKIM has been alive for at least a year and DK
has been alive for at least two years?
We each only have so many cycles to devote to this document. I
strongly believe the WG don't want to reset the process and are
right to hold that opinion.
Stephen.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html