On Jun 2, 2007, at 9:40 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Saturday 02 June 2007 12:27, Steve Atkins wrote:
So if the spec states "SSP clients must query for new RR first, then
TXT" you wouldn't expect most receivers to comply with that?
Eventually, if the new RR type gets some deployment.
The original statement by Arvel (which Hector agreed with) was:
If we come out with a spec that states "SSP clients must query for
new RR first, then TXT" senders would be right to expect compliance.
I do not see how this statement can be true for, at least, several
years. Hence my question to Arvel and Hector - is this statement
false, or are they assuming SSP deployment will wait until widespread
adoption of a new RR.
Cheers,
Steve
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html