Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
OK how about this as a plan
1) We do policy according to the view of scope currently being expressed by the
chairs and myself.
2) You and I submit a four page ID that registers a NOMAIL policy for DKIM.
3) The group decides whether to accept the paragraph of text into the text of
the main draft or not during the Draft phase.
You see, more rhetorical judo. You're not intimidating no one Phil.
Why four? Why not SIX? or TEN?
I have a better idea. Since the work already done, I can just reissue
DSAP I-D and if the chairs do no want to consider it, begin promoting
this independently as an alternative SSP/XPTR solution?
Might not be a bad idea since I can model this as an abstract model and
give sysops a choice to use DSAP, SSP/XPTR. We can get it implemented
into our system, finally turn on the DKIM switch, release it and
instantly get thousands of Wildcat! systems using it.
--
Sincerely
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html