ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out of scope.

2007-06-05 13:49:05
Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
OK how about this as a plan

1) We do policy according to the view of scope currently being expressed by the 
chairs and myself.
2) You and I submit a four page ID that registers a NOMAIL policy for DKIM.
3) The group decides whether to accept the paragraph of text into the text of 
the main draft or not during the Draft phase.


You see, more rhetorical judo. You're not intimidating no one Phil. Why four? Why not SIX? or TEN?

I have a better idea. Since the work already done, I can just reissue DSAP I-D and if the chairs do no want to consider it, begin promoting this independently as an alternative SSP/XPTR solution?

Might not be a bad idea since I can model this as an abstract model and give sysops a choice to use DSAP, SSP/XPTR. We can get it implemented into our system, finally turn on the DKIM switch, release it and instantly get thousands of Wildcat! systems using it.

--
Sincerely

Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>