On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 16:22:16 -0000, J D Falk <jdfalk(_at_)returnpath(_dot_)net>
wrote:
Charles Lindsey suggested:
And I am still happy to see BCP material which then, essentially,
describes ways in which verifiers are "expected"
to apply the "advice".
A fine idea -- except, how do we list Best Current Practices when there
are no current practices yet?
The particular practices I have in mind are those already in the draft,
but currently confusingly described by the use of 2119-like MUSTard.
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131
Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html