Re: [ietf-dkim] Review of DKIM Sender Signing Practices (draft-ietf-dkim

John Levine wrote:
> In article <47549320(_dot_)9000307(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net> you write:
> >    Review of:
> >
> >      DKIM Sender Signing Practices  (draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-01)
> Wow, thanks for a very thorough review.
>
> The biggest problem with this draft is that it goes way beyond
> defining a protocol.
>
> Part of it describes the way that senders publish statements about
> their sending practices and the way that receivers can look for those
> statements, which is fine, but the rest attempts to tell receivers
> what to do with mail they have received, which is not.
  At this point, making sweeping condemnations is pointless. If you want
  something in the draft changed, suggest specifics. Better yet: use the
  ISSUE mechanism for which Eliot is still paying attention, I believe.

                Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html