ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1524: Signature semantics

2007-12-12 04:06:18

Hi Jim,

Jim Fenton wrote:
SSP does require one additional semantic over that of DKIM-base:  in
addition to taking responsibility for the message, those domains that
publish SSP records other than "unknown" must assert that, when the
address in the From: header field is really their domain, that this is
actually true.  

That statement isn't very clear to me.

Do you mean: When a domain publishes an SSP != unknown, then it
states that it does not emit messages where the rfc2822.from
domain is outside its own domain?

If so:

- "emit" and "outside" would need defining
- should that be "messages" or "signed messages"

If not, I'm confused.

Regards,
Stephen.

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html