ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: Signature semantics

2007-12-11 23:19:55
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On Dec 11, 2007, at 7:23 PM, John Levine wrote:

The issue is mandatory end-user identification with i=.

To make it more concrete, can we take this as a proposal to
change section 2.8 to remove references to the local-part?



Yes, thank you for being better at being concrete than me.

        Jon


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Universal 2.6.3
Charset: US-ASCII

wj8DBQFHX3ygsTedWZOD3gYRAqAdAKDuVsd5kG2bkVZsIcyC3KuzoZR/EQCeN7ii
u9uvCOYRG4VcROGB0M0ghTM=
=GsLP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html