Jim Fenton wrote:
Dave Crocker wrote:
The practices that SSP describe are specific to the RFC2822 From:
header field, which defines the author of a message. It does not
seek to describe practices of other agents in email handling.
As such, the name of the specification should reflect its precise
scope. The current name of "Sender" Signing Practices is imprecise
and misleading.
The name should be changed to Author Signing Practices (ASP).
+1, but given that we have a WG draft called SSP and an individual
draft called ASP which, I understand, is also under active revision I
would not support this until the name change would not introduce
confusion, i.e., when there is not active discussion about a draft of
the same name as we would use.
-Jim
+1.
Eliot
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html