-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of J D Falk
John Levine wrote:
Trying to forbid random other third party signatures is, as I expect
you'd agree, just silly.
And yet, treating any random third party signature as if it's just as
valid as a first party signature is, as I expect you'd agree, the kind
of security issue that would cause someone to stand up on a chair and
shout "DKIM will never be useful for anything, and you people all suck
toads!"
Yet another reason to leave 3rd party signatures (and toad-sucking)
out
of scope, I suppose.
Explicitly out of scope. Because not all 3rd party signatures on email
are "random", and there are a number of valid use cases that include
them.
Ellen
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html