Siegel, Ellen wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of J D Falk
Explicitly out of scope. Because not all 3rd party signatures on email
are "random", and there are a number of valid use cases that include
them.
hmmmmm, this sounds like an explicit in scope statement.
So essentially, if I read you correctly, you want MTAs to completely
ignore messages with 3rd party signatures as if the message was never
signed?
At what point or stage during the transport and/or delivery process do
they become "in play" and for whom?
According to Falk, if I read him right, he indicated a domain can use
DKIM=DISCARDABLE to protect against unwanted 3rd party signatures.
Do you agree?
--
Sincerely
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html