Frank Ellermann wrote:
Stephen Farrell wrote:
a bunch of these appear to me to be editorial improvements
in an informational document that attracted no comment
when posted
Apparently Jim and Dave discussed this point in "overview",
compare <http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.dkim/9857>.
Good catch thanks. The thread I missed is also at:
http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/2008q1/009807.html
Nonetheless, I think the disposition of this one should be
the same - let the editors do their job and then see if
any problems remain. In this case since we have someone
who seems to care that this stay open rather than close
by default, we'll specifically ask the list if 1563 can be
closed a while after overview-10 issues.
Stephen.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html