I support this, as well as the wording that emphasizes d='s role.
I particularly like the analogy here .. where it puts forward a
concept I have of d= being the sum(i= 1-n) from an authority and
reputation perspective.
--------
This document was initially formulated by an ad hoc design team,
comprising: Jon Callas, J D Falk, Jim Fenton, Tony Hansen, Murray
Kucherawy, John Levine, Michael Hammer, Jeff Macdonald, Ellen Siegel,
Wietse Venema. It represents a rough consensus of that effort,
although the final wording of the submitted draft is the sole
responsibility (d=) of the listed author.
--------
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Dave CROCKER <dhc(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net>
wrote:
I've just submitted an Internet Draft with text for the working group to
consider. A group of us have been working on it.
It clarifies and resolves the roles and relationship of the d= and i= tag.
An html version of the I-D is at:
<http://dkim.org/specs/draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-00.html>
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html