Stephen Farrell wrote:
Separately, is the best route from here to do a 4871bis
(assuming the 5378 mess gets sorted), that incorporates
all agreed errata to date? If not, then what?
Stephen,
The intent for this effort was to issue it as an Errata entry, per
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php>.
The changes are narrow and few. We really don't need to generate a brand new
RFC just for this. Or at least, not yet, IMO.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html