ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] draft Errata on RFC 4871

2009-01-26 17:33:01
On 26/01/2009 06:48, "John Levine" <johnl(_at_)iecc(_dot_)com> wrote:

In article <497DAAF9(_dot_)4000304(_at_)att(_dot_)com> you write:
I strongly support working on a 4871bis >>and<< moving DKIMbase forward
to Draft Standard as part of that.

Same here.  I don't feel strongly about errata vs. 4871bis, so I have
a practical preference for whatever will get it through the IESG and
published as expeditiously as possible.

+1

Also, +1 to Suresh's suggestion of a use cases document.

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html