Re: [ietf-dkim] draft Errata on RFC 4871

John Levine wrote:
> Except that the UAID might or might not be an e-mail address.  The one
> on this messgage isn't.
So, for clarity, can you (or someone) call out what you think is
the impact, if any, for ADSP, caused by this proposed change to
4871.

Thanks,
Stephen.

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html