ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] draft Errata on RFC 4871

2009-01-26 12:48:16
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Michael Adkins
<michael(_dot_)adkins(_at_)corp(_dot_)aol(_dot_)com> wrote:
Would it make more sense to suggest that the mail system make the UAID
clear to the reader if its the identity whose reputation was used to
deliver the message, and make the SDID clear to the reader otherwise?

The RFC seems to steer clear from it beyond emphasizing the
differences between sdid / uaid.

Maybe just leave this for the use case document I suggested? If it is
inappropriate for an RFC, it could be produced as a maawg document.

--srs
-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops(_dot_)lists(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com)
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html