On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:23 AM, Dave CROCKER <dhc(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net>
wrote:
John R. Levine wrote:
Gee, how many ways are there to say that i= doesn't identify the user?
The i= field doesn't do that. DKIM doesn't identify individuals, only
domains.
John,
Oh boy.
Your statement is not correct.
The spec says that it *does* identify a user.
Now that I have john levine and dave crocker in disagreement on just
what i= does .. :
Then we desperately need to rewrite whatever part of 4871 leads anyone to
that erroneous conclusion.
Right, thanks, John.
--suresh
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html