Christ. I'd support Steve Atkins when he suggests entirely gutting
this spec to remove half the alphabet, retaining just d= and one or
two others (i= with caveats, t= I dare say)?
suresh
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 3:44 AM, Dave CROCKER <dcrocker(_at_)bbiw(_dot_)net>
wrote:
Bill(_dot_)Oxley(_at_)cox(_dot_)com wrote:
Been trying to avoid it but .... my understanding was that i=author d=signer
i=foobar.coxhosted.com d=dkim.signer.coxmail.com and that was how 3rd party
signing was going to work
1. the spec does not say that i= author.
2. a requirement that i=author renders DKIM useless for signing by any agent
in
the sequence other than the author's. This goes entirely against the usage
flexibility that has (always) been a goal of DKIM.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops(_dot_)lists(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com)
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html