Folks,
G'day.
The latest version of:
RFC 4871 DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures -- Errata
draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-02
<http://dkim.org/ietf-dkim.htm#errata>
was posted 8 days ago. A competing proposal was posted 2 days ago.
On reviewing the list activity, concerning the the contents of
rfc4871-errata-02, I've seen:
* Some debate about a vocabulary choice that appears to be have
converged
on retaining the current usage and definition
* One posting noting some minor typos that can be fixed for the released
version
* Some requests for progressing the current draft.
Concerning the alternative proposal, I've seen only one posting in its favor.
Consequently, I'd like to ask that we go through a working group Last Call for
rfc4871-errata-02.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html