On 2/12/09 7:31 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
Eliot Lear wrote:
You've seen several votes for the alternate, but in any case Jim has
offered alternate language, which i am inclined to accept. I would
be happy to proceed, however, with a poll on the process, if you
would like.
1. Jim sent the only posting that I read as simple, direct support.
And Murray also indicated support, at least in part, but had questions
about whether I felt it was appropriate to address your core concern
about having a single gazzouta, and wanted an answer, which I gave.
2. My request was for +1/-1 postings on
draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-02, not a request for a multi-stage
sequence starting with meta-questions about process.
Yes, and I would prefer the multi-stage approach, because I consider
draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-02 to be excessive to the problem at
hand, lacking consideration for the appropriate tradeoffs on readability.
Eliot
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html