Eliot Lear wrote:
You've seen several votes for the alternate, but in any case Jim has
offered alternate language, which i am inclined to accept. I would be
happy to proceed, however, with a poll on the process, if you would like.
1. Jim sent the only posting that I read as simple, direct support.
2. My request was for +1/-1 postings on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-02, not
a
request for a multi-stage sequence starting with meta-questions about process.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html