On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:31:37 -0800 Dave CROCKER <dcrocker(_at_)bbiw(_dot_)net>
wrote:
Eliot Lear wrote:
You've seen several votes for the alternate, but in any case Jim has
offered alternate language, which i am inclined to accept. I would be
happy to proceed, however, with a poll on the process, if you would like.
1. Jim sent the only posting that I read as simple, direct support.
2. My request was for +1/-1 postings on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-02,
not a
request for a multi-stage sequence starting with meta-questions about
process.
Don't wg chairs start LC?
Also I sent a +1 to this list for Elliot's proposal, so your accounting is
incomplete.
Scott K
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html