ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] NO DKIM "POLICY"

2009-02-19 14:45:50
On the lines of "v=spf1 -all"  or example.com.  IN MX 0 .  (mark
delany's old mxzerodot proposal)?

Yes a null signature could probably do it but something more explicit
perhaps to signal that this is not simply breakage?

On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Hector Santos 
<hsantos(_at_)santronics(_dot_)com> wrote:
What is the current recommended method to establish or expose that a
DOMAIN should not be signed, is not expected to be signed and that any
DKIM supportive receiver seeing a message with a signature from a
purported domain should be rejected with full confidence?

Will a NULL public key do the trick?

Thanks

--
Sincerely

Hector Santos
http://www.santronics.com


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html




-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops(_dot_)lists(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com)
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>