ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] NO DKIM "POLICY"

2009-02-19 17:05:41
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Hector Santos wrote:
What is the current recommended method to establish or expose that a 
DOMAIN should not be signed, is not expected to be signed and that any 
DKIM supportive receiver seeing a message with a signature from a 
purported domain should be rejected with full confidence?

Will a NULL public key do the trick?

At the moment ADSP doesn't have such a mechanism.  It could (and used to) 
but then one issue is that you always have to query for such a record 
instead of only querying when there's no valid author domain signature.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html