On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Michael Thomas <mike(_at_)mtcc(_dot_)com> wrote:
If your sole goal in ADSP is "declare that domain x signs all mail"
then there could be a far simpler and more cut down version of ADSP
that'd fit the bill. To wit - the "locked ADSP record" part.
I don't understand what this means.
I was looking at an older draft-otis, Sorry.
The adsp draft on dkim.org calls this "bulk mailing domains with
discardable mail"
That's a special case. And I think that's the one case Mike Hammer is
concerned about, rather than the rest of it. It would be a valid
concern / need for me too - but I dont see how or why the rest of ADSP
has to be supported solely for that one bit of quite useful
functionality.
-srs
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html