ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call

2009-03-09 15:32:30
The discussion seems to be straying beyond certain useful
boundaries... as Stephen says, let's keep it within those.  So, in
particular, with my "participant" hat on:

It seems to me that the relevant point isn't whether you do or don't
like ADSP and whether you will or won't deploy it... but, rather, that
we agree on the details of it.  If you're a signer and you don't like
ADSP, you won't publish ADSP information.  If you're a verifier and
you don't like ADSP, you won't retrieve ADSP information.

So what matters is that we agree on what the ADSP information says and
means, and that we agree on the interpretation by a verifier of its
absence.

Barry
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>