I can do that, but it will probably take a few days. But for
clarification, is the new terminology cast in stone? I have a
particular problem with the term "User Agent Identifier (UAID)" because
it doesn't necessarily represent a user agent -- it could, for example,
represent a mailing list manager. I greatly prefer the term "signing
identifier" (which replaces signing identity) because it covers the
range of use cases more completely.
I'd say it's a fair proposal, and we'll see where it goes.
What I meant was that, for example, it won't work to propose text
changes that roll back the terminology changes altogether. Or
something like that. A proposed change with a reason behind it gives
everyone something to work with and to decide, one way or t'other.
Barry
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html