Before I attempt to answer Dave's question, I have two questions for the
Chairs:
1. Is discussion of ADSP on the list in order again?
2. It sounds like what's being proposed here is a "do over" of the WG
and IETF Last Calls on the ADSP specification, by making a substantial
change. Is that in order?
-Jim
Dave CROCKER wrote:
Isn't it much simpler, and entirely sufficient, to have ADSP use SDID (d=)?
I am not understanding the downside to the choice.
The alternatives all seem significantly more complicated and probably
problematic.
d/
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html