Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP

ietf-dkim

Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP

2009-03-27 18:16:24

The current proposal is to remove i= here, and rework the text so that
ADSP uses d= only.  We note the following:


That's fine with me.  I still don't see much utility in ADSP but this
keeps it from damaging DKIM.

R's,
John
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, DKIM Chair Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, John Levine <= Message not available Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, Mark Delany Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, Douglas Otis Message not available Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, Douglas Otis Message not available Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, Hector Santos Message not available Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, Hector Santos Message not available Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, Charles Lindsey Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, Wietse Venema Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, Charles Lindsey Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, Hector Santos

Previous by Date:	Re: [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque), Douglas Otis
Next by Date:	Re: [ietf-dkim] what is a standard, was errata revision: Assessor, J.D. Falk
Previous by Thread:	Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, Hector Santos
Next by Thread:	Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, Mark Delany
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]