ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP

2009-03-31 06:45:42
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:29:29 +0100, Wietse Venema 
<wietse(_at_)porcupine(_dot_)org>  
wrote:

Charles Lindsey:
From: someone(_at_)foo(_dot_)example            
From:someone(_at_)foo(_dot_)example
Valid signature from foo.example     Absent/broken signature from  
foo.example
       ACCEPT                               DISCARD

Right.

 From someone(_at_)bar(_dot_)example             From 
someone(_at_)bar(_dot_)example
Valid signature from foo.example     Absent/broken signature from
foo.example
       ???????                              ????????

ADSP is about first-party signatures. The above are not, thus
the discard rule applies. See draft section 2.7.

Indeed, but it is the signing policy of bar.example (as opposed to  
foo.example) that would have to be applied.

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131                       
   Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>