On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 02:00:01 +0100, <Internet-Drafts(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org> wrote:
Title : RFC 4871 DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures
-- Update
Author(s) : D. Crocker
Filename : draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-03.txt
Pages : 12
Date : 2009-04-03
This updates RFC 4871, DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures.
Specifically the document clarifies the nature, roles and
relationship of the two DKIM identifier tag values that are
candidates for payload delivery to a receiving processing module.
The Update is in the style of an Errata entry, albeit a rather long
one.
I would much prefer that it created a new RFC to _Supersede_ RFC 4871,
containing the full text as amended, and with an Appendix listing the
changes made (whether in full "old/new" format like this draft, or
otherwise), and pointing out that NO change to the protocol was intended
or implied.
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131
Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html