On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:15:18 +0100, Hector Santos
<hsantos(_at_)santronics(_dot_)com>
wrote:
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple;
d=mipassoc.org; s=k00001; ....
From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk-lists(_at_)cybernothing(_dot_)org>
or this:
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple;
d=mipassoc.org; s=k00001;....
From: HLS <sant9442(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>
Neither of those are Author (Domain) Signatures. They indicate that
mipassoc.org has processed them, and that mipassoc believes they are
"worthy of all men to be believed" (whatever that means). I would not
expect a simple minded Assessor to be impressed, or to take any action
either way (unless there are _additional_ signatures that are more
impressive). A smarter Assessor that knows the reputation of mipassoc.org
_might_ be a little more impressed.
Neither signature does any harm, but they don't do much good either.
which by the way
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple;
d=gmail.com; ....
From: HLS <sant9442(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>
And that looks like a perfectly good Author Signature, which any assessor
SHOULD pass without further ado.
Before mipassoc.org got its hands on it, is all about 3rd party "mail
DKIM interference" with 1st party or other 3rd party signatures.
If you don't control this, then we will undoubtedly begin to see:
I don't see WHY you want to control this. All the examples are harmless.
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple;
d=some_phisher.com; ....
From: Poor User <Poor(_dot_)User(_at_)cox(_dot_)net>
And that should be harmless too, unless some_fisher.com has acquired an
excessively negative reputation.
If COX.NET has not plans to deal with this, either with ADSP or
something else, that pity the Poor User at cox.net. Sure, the fancy
reputation system will eventually score up points on some_phisher.com
or someone will report it early on, but it might be too late for Poor
User at cox.net.
Why? Of course it would be better if COX.NET had added a signature first,
with an ADSP record to explain it, but that is not essential.
I just do not see what you are getting at.
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131
Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html