DKIM is about domains, not email addresses. And that's all ADSP should be.
Using i= encourages this cofusion. Using "Author Signature" rather than
"Author
Domain Signature" also encourages it.
Indeed.
As I recall, when we started this, both pre-IETF and bringing it into
the IETF, one goal was to allow, in the architecture, extension to
individual authors... but *not* to deal with individual authors at
this stage. It was, in fact, one (of several) of the arguments about
why we couldn't just use S/MIME.
If the domain owner cannot exert enough administrative control, to keep
signatures for mailing lists separate from signatures for authors, then that's
the owner's problem. It shouldn't be the receivers.
I agree.
Barry (participant)
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html