Again, call it what you want, UAID, SDID, Author Domain Signature vs
Gmail domain signatues or mipassoc.org domain signatures, etc, when
you have this:
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple;
d=mipassoc.org; s=k00001; ....
From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk-lists(_at_)cybernothing(_dot_)org>
or this:
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple;
d=mipassoc.org; s=k00001;....
From: HLS <sant9442(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>
which by the way
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple;
d=gmail.com; ....
From: HLS <sant9442(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>
Before mipassoc.org got its hands on it, is all about 3rd party "mail
DKIM interference" with 1st party or other 3rd party signatures.
If you don't control this, then we will undoubtedly begin to see:
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple;
d=some_phisher.com; ....
From: Poor User <Poor(_dot_)User(_at_)cox(_dot_)net>
If COX.NET has not plans to deal with this, either with ADSP or
something else, that pity the Poor User at cox.net. Sure, the fancy
reputation system will eventually score up points on some_phisher.com
or someone will report it early on, but it might be too late for Poor
User at cox.net.
If you ask me, if here is monetary harm for Poor User and he hires joe
the lawyer, this is a valid case of engineering neglect and
malpractice - experts in the field knew the problem existed and
allowed was still allowed to perpetuate. Cox.net might had to deal
with this. But don't take none of this from me. Present it like I
said to your chief council and see what he says.
--
Sincerely
Hector Santos
http://www.santronics.com
Hector Santos wrote:
Bill(_dot_)Oxley(_at_)cox(_dot_)com wrote:
3rd party signing was removed from discussion some time ago
Only by name, just like Dave stated here:
"All that is left is the more general question of deciding how to
distinguish among outgoing mail streams with different SDID values."
Call it want what you please, the issues of 1st party vs 3rd party is
still in play. What do you think this i= thing was all about?
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html