Re: [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing

John Levine wrote:
> > But what section 2.7 talks about has to do with the use of the i=
> > value.  
> Huh?  In our current draft, there's no mention of i= other than your
> proposed warning.
Then it doesn't meet the requirement in RFC 5016, section 5.3, item 2.

                Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html