Current? No.
Future? Yes.
Michael Thomas wrote:
Barry Leiba wrote:
The usual set of formats and diffs are at:
<http://dkim.org/ietf-dkim.htm#errata>
I'm sending the PROTO write-up to Pasi to get processing started on
this. Of course, serious errors can still be corrected, if necessary.
Barry (as chair)
I continue to be amazed at how utterly useless this document is, and
more so that people are being asked to break a sweat to issue it. The
most serious error is that it is a solution in search of a problem.
Is there *one* person/organization here who can say that this text
changed or affected their implementation in any way?
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html