On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Michael Thomas <mike(_at_)mtcc(_dot_)com>
wrote:
Barry Leiba wrote:
The usual set of formats and diffs are at:
<http://dkim.org/ietf-dkim.htm#errata>
I'm sending the PROTO write-up to Pasi to get processing started on
this. Of course, serious errors can still be corrected, if necessary.
Barry (as chair)
I continue to be amazed at how utterly useless this document is, and
more so that people are being asked to break a sweat to issue it. The
most serious error is that it is a solution in search of a problem.
Is there *one* person/organization here who can say that this text
changed or affected their implementation in any way?
Yes. It hasn't affected our current implementation, but it will help
to guide me on implementation choices I make in the future.
Regards,
Al Iverson
ExactTarget
--
Al Iverson on Spam and Deliverability, see http://www.spamresource.com
News, stats, info, and commentary on blacklists: http://www.dnsbl.com
My personal website: http://www.aliverson.com -- Chicago, IL, USA
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html