Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis p

Wietse Venema wrote:

> > To me, this is the REAL BIS material that should be reevaluated, 
> > because to me, that is one of the barriers to adoption.
> I rest my case.
DKIM's pathetic state is your case.

-- 
Sincerely

Hector Santos
http://www.santronics.com


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html