[ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- SHA1 support, Dave CROCKER, 2009/05/30

• Re: [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- SHA1 support, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond, 2009/05/30

[ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type, Dave CROCKER, 2009/05/30

• Re: [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 2009/05/31

[ietf-dkim] Urgent: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10 and RFC 5451, Barry Leiba, 2009/05/28

• Re: [ietf-dkim] Urgent: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10 and RFC 5451, Murray S. Kucherawy, 2009/05/28
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] Urgent: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10 and RFC 5451, J.D. Falk, 2009/05/28
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Urgent: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10 and RFC 5451, Siegel, Ellen, 2009/05/29
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Urgent: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10 and RFC 5451, MH Michael Hammer \(5304\), 2009/05/29
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Urgent: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10 and RFC 5451, Jeff Macdonald, 2009/05/29
• Re: [ietf-dkim] Urgent: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10 and RFC 5451, Jim Fenton, 2009/05/28

[ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Franck Martin, 2009/05/26

• Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Steve Atkins, 2009/05/26
• Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 2009/05/26
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Franck Martin, 2009/05/26
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 2009/05/26
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Steve Atkins, 2009/05/26
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Franck Martin, 2009/05/26
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 2009/05/26
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Franck Martin, 2009/05/27
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 2009/05/27
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Franck Martin, 2009/05/27
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Al Iverson, 2009/05/27
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Dave CROCKER, 2009/05/27
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Michael Adkins, 2009/05/27
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Dave CROCKER, 2009/05/28
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Michael Adkins, 2009/05/28
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Dave CROCKER, 2009/05/28
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Michael Adkins, 2009/05/28
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Steve Atkins, 2009/05/28
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Jeff Macdonald, 2009/05/28
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Michael Adkins, 2009/05/28
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Dave CROCKER, 2009/05/28
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Michael Adkins, 2009/05/28
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Steve Atkins, 2009/05/26
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Bill.Oxley, 2009/05/27
• Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Florian Sager, 2009/05/29
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 2009/05/29
• Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Franck Martin, 2009/05/26
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 2009/05/26
• Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Franck Martin, 2009/05/28
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Michael Adkins, 2009/05/28
• Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Franck Martin, 2009/05/28
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Michael Adkins, 2009/05/28
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Franck Martin, 2009/05/28
• Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Franck Martin, 2009/05/29

[ietf-dkim] On the Selector, Franck Martin, 2009/05/25

• Re: [ietf-dkim] On the Selector, Dave CROCKER, 2009/05/25
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] On the Selector, Franck Martin, 2009/05/25
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] On the Selector, Dave CROCKER, 2009/05/25
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] On the Selector, Franck Martin, 2009/05/25
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] On the Selector, Steve Atkins, 2009/05/25
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] On the Selector, Dave CROCKER, 2009/05/25
• Re: [ietf-dkim] On the Selector, Steve Atkins, 2009/05/25
• Re: [ietf-dkim] On the Selector, Franck Martin, 2009/05/25
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] On the Selector, Steve Atkins, 2009/05/25
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] On the Selector, Dave CROCKER, 2009/05/25
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] On the Selector, Douglas Otis, 2009/05/26
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] On the Selector, J.D. Falk, 2009/05/27

[ietf-dkim] A question about public key formats, Steve Atkins, 2009/05/23

• Re: [ietf-dkim] A question about public key formats, John Levine, 2009/05/25
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] A question about public key formats, John Levine, 2009/05/25

[ietf-dkim] let's screw up a good thing, Michael Thomas, 2009/05/22

• Re: [ietf-dkim] let's screw up a good thing, Wietse Venema, 2009/05/22
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] let's screw up a good thing, Hector Santos, 2009/05/23
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] let's screw up a good thing, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 2009/05/23
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] let's screw up a good thing, Dave CROCKER, 2009/05/23
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] let's screw up a good thing, Hector Santos, 2009/05/23
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] let's screw up a good thing, Hector Santos, 2009/05/23

[ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Eliot Lear, 2009/05/22

• Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Douglas Otis, 2009/05/22
• Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, J.D. Falk, 2009/05/22
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, J.D. Falk, 2009/05/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Doug Otis, 2009/05/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, J.D. Falk, 2009/05/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Doug Otis, 2009/05/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Barry Leiba, 2009/05/28
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Doug Otis, 2009/05/28
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Barry Leiba, 2009/05/28
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, J.D. Falk, 2009/05/28
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Douglas Otis, 2009/05/28
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Tony Hansen, 2009/05/29
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Michael Thomas, 2009/05/29
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Dave CROCKER, 2009/05/30
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] who's using l=, John Levine, 2009/05/30
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Wietse Venema, 2009/05/22
    • [ietf-dkim] evangelizing dkim, Dave CROCKER, 2009/05/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Charles Lindsey, 2009/05/25
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary, John Levine, 2009/05/25
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary, Barry Leiba, 2009/05/28
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary, John R. Levine, 2009/05/28
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary, Barry Leiba, 2009/05/29
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary, Michael Thomas, 2009/05/29
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary, John R. Levine, 2009/05/29
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary, Douglas Otis, 2009/05/29
• Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Michael Thomas, 2009/05/22

Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Hector Santos, 2009/05/21

• Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Wietse Venema, 2009/05/21
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Hector Santos, 2009/05/21

Re: [ietf-dkim] Lingering discussion on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Barry Leiba, 2009/05/01

• Re: [ietf-dkim] Lingering discussion on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Doug Otis, 2009/05/01
• Re: [ietf-dkim] Lingering discussion on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, J.D. Falk, 2009/05/04

[ietf-dkim] The "real" (remaining) errata, Barry Leiba, 2009/05/01

• Re: [ietf-dkim] The "real" (remaining) errata, Doug Otis, 2009/05/01
• Message not available
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] The "real" (remaining) errata, Barry Leiba, 2009/05/01
• Message not available
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] The "real" (remaining) errata, Pasi.Eronen, 2009/05/05

[ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Barry Leiba, 2009/05/01

• Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Michael Thomas, 2009/05/01
• Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Tony Hansen, 2009/05/02
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Eliot Lear, 2009/05/04
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 2009/05/04
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Jeff Macdonald, 2009/05/04
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Eliot Lear, 2009/05/04
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Jeff Macdonald, 2009/05/04
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, John Levine, 2009/05/04
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Michael Thomas, 2009/05/04
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, J.D. Falk, 2009/05/04
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Michael Thomas, 2009/05/04
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Barry Leiba, 2009/05/04
    • Message not available
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Dave CROCKER, 2009/05/06
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Eliot Lear, 2009/05/06
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Dave CROCKER, 2009/05/06
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Douglas Otis, 2009/05/06
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Jim Fenton, 2009/05/07
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Dave CROCKER, 2009/05/08
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Eliot Lear, 2009/05/08
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Dave CROCKER, 2009/05/08
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Michael Thomas, 2009/05/08
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Jim Fenton, 2009/05/08
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Stephen Farrell, 2009/05/08
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Douglas Otis, 2009/05/08
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Michael Thomas, 2009/05/08
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Steve Atkins, 2009/05/08
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 2009/05/08
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Dave CROCKER, 2009/05/09
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Steve Atkins, 2009/05/09
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, John Levine, 2009/05/08
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Hector Santos, 2009/05/09
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Steve Atkins, 2009/05/09
    • [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Steve Atkins, 2009/05/09
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered: sha1 vs sha256, Tony Hansen, 2009/05/09
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered: sha1 vs sha256, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 2009/05/09
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Hector Santos, 2009/05/09
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Mark Delany, 2009/05/09
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Hector Santos, 2009/05/10
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Murray S. Kucherawy, 2009/05/11
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Dave CROCKER, 2009/05/11
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, John Levine, 2009/05/11
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Murray S. Kucherawy, 2009/05/11
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Charles Lindsey, 2009/05/11
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, John Levine, 2009/05/11
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Steve Atkins, 2009/05/11
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Eliot Lear, 2009/05/11
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Steve Atkins, 2009/05/11
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Dave CROCKER, 2009/05/20
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Douglas Otis, 2009/05/20
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Steve Atkins, 2009/05/20
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Michael Thomas, 2009/05/20
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Steve Atkins, 2009/05/20
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Michael Thomas, 2009/05/20
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Steve Atkins, 2009/05/20
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Michael Thomas, 2009/05/20
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Steve Atkins, 2009/05/20
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Michael Thomas, 2009/05/20
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Steve Atkins, 2009/05/20
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Michael Thomas, 2009/05/20
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Hector Santos, 2009/05/20
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, SM, 2009/05/20
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Murray S. Kucherawy, 2009/05/20
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Michael Thomas, 2009/05/20
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Douglas Otis, 2009/05/20
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Eliot Lear, 2009/05/21
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Eliot Lear, 2009/05/21
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Dave CROCKER, 2009/05/21
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Eliot Lear, 2009/05/21
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Dave CROCKER, 2009/05/21
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Eliot Lear, 2009/05/21
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Dave CROCKER, 2009/05/21
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Michael Thomas, 2009/05/21
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Eliot Lear, 2009/05/21
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Douglas Otis, 2009/05/21
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Charles Lindsey, 2009/05/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, John Levine, 2009/05/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Doug Otis, 2009/05/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, John Levine, 2009/05/23
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Hector Santos, 2009/05/21
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Bill.Oxley, 2009/05/21
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, John Levine, 2009/05/21
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Eliot Lear, 2009/05/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Douglas Otis, 2009/05/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, John R. Levine, 2009/05/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Eliot Lear, 2009/05/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, John R. Levine, 2009/05/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Dave CROCKER, 2009/05/20
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Charles Lindsey, 2009/05/21
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Douglas Otis, 2009/05/11
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, J.D. Falk, 2009/05/11
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Murray S. Kucherawy, 2009/05/11
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Wietse Venema, 2009/05/09
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Michael Thomas, 2009/05/09
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 2009/05/09
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Hector Santos, 2009/05/09
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Siegel, Ellen, 2009/05/10
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Eliot Lear, 2009/05/10
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Dave CROCKER, 2009/05/10
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Eliot Lear, 2009/05/10
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 2009/05/10
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Hector Santos, 2009/05/10
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Murray S. Kucherawy, 2009/05/11
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Dave CROCKER, 2009/05/11
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Murray S. Kucherawy, 2009/05/11
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Dave CROCKER, 2009/05/11
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Murray S. Kucherawy, 2009/05/11
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Eliot Lear, 2009/05/11
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Douglas Otis, 2009/05/11
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Hector Santos, 2009/05/11

[ietf-dkim] To meet, or not, in Stockholm, Barry Leiba, 2009/05/01

• Re: [ietf-dkim] To meet, or not, in Stockholm, Barry Leiba, 2009/05/19
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] To meet, or not, in Stockholm, Dave CROCKER, 2009/05/19
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] To meet, or not, in Stockholm, Michael Thomas, 2009/05/19

Re: [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing, Barry Leiba, 2009/05/01

• Re: [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing, Al Iverson, 2009/05/01