J.D. Falk wrote:
MailMan is covered, though
[ . . . ]
(This message will be signed, too, with a different key on the same box.)
Even better! The MIPAssoc server (also running MailMan) swapped my
signature for Authentication-Results, and signed the new message.
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=mipassoc.org; s=k00001;
t=1243013748; bh=KKzdl+Xw6IloZrUtOCIjcoI2bG8=; h=Message-ID:Date:
From:MIME-Version:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id:
List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:
Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=If3rAwfKN03nqJhjL
EqKR6+0izu3ujK8ak0Oa4AMAuTwZtofkhfGqH6V11/OmvVIPclZ45L0zTsbmYT8XoXN
5c66LqkE9t/leS246vbssPyoNF3SBhrhFmhuSWno5S5YGLFb3bYto06u8dRLhmakafg
1MvoT6tUnSj5aHo+uCOI=
Received: from ocelope.disgruntled.net (ocelope.disgruntled.net
[97.107.131.76])
by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n4MHZLXK017726
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL)
for <ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org>; Fri, 22 May 2009 10:35:27 -0700
Authentication-Results: sbh17.songbird.com;
dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header(_dot_)i=(_at_)cybernothing(_dot_)org
I love it when FUD is so easily overridden by operational reality.
--
J.D. Falk
Return Path Inc
http://www.returnpath.net/
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html