IETF DKIM (date)

IETF DKIM (date)

[Thread Index] [Top] [All Lists]

May 31, 2009

Re: [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 09:26

May 30, 2009

Re: [ietf-dkim] who's using l=, John Levine, 20:08
Re: [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- SHA1 support, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond, 19:29
[ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-overview-12.txt, Internet-Drafts, 13:49
[ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- other features, Dave CROCKER, 13:44
[ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- SHA1 support, Dave CROCKER, 13:40
[ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- t=y: Domain is testing DKIM, Dave CROCKER, 13:34
[ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type, Dave CROCKER, 13:31
[ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- h: Acceptable hash algorithms, Dave CROCKER, 13:25
[ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- z: Copied header fields, Dave CROCKER, 13:20
[ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- x: Signature expiration, Dave CROCKER, 13:16
Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Dave CROCKER, 13:12

May 29, 2009

Re: [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary, Douglas Otis, 20:03
Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Franck Martin, 18:51
Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Michael Thomas, 18:10
Re: [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary, John R. Levine, 17:26
Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Tony Hansen, 16:10
Re: [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary, Michael Thomas, 13:58
Re: [ietf-dkim] Urgent: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10 and RFC 5451, Jeff Macdonald, 12:53
Re: [ietf-dkim] Urgent: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10 and RFC 5451, MH Michael Hammer \(5304\), 12:15
Re: [ietf-dkim] Urgent: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10 and RFC 5451, Siegel, Ellen, 11:29
Re: [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary, Barry Leiba, 09:41
Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 08:12
Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Florian Sager, 04:07

May 28, 2009

Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Douglas Otis, 21:24
Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, J.D. Falk, 20:04
Re: [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary, John R. Levine, 18:37
Re: [ietf-dkim] Urgent: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10 and RFC 5451, Jim Fenton, 17:59
Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Franck Martin, 16:19
Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Michael Adkins, 16:09
Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Barry Leiba, 16:05
Re: [ietf-dkim] Urgent: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10 and RFC 5451, J.D. Falk, 15:53
Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Franck Martin, 15:47
Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Jeff Macdonald, 15:38
Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Doug Otis, 15:34
Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Michael Adkins, 15:17
Re: [ietf-dkim] Urgent: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10 and RFC 5451, Murray S. Kucherawy, 15:08
Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Franck Martin, 14:34
Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Barry Leiba, 12:31
Re: [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary, Barry Leiba, 12:26
Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Steve Atkins, 12:20
Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Michael Adkins, 12:13
Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Michael Adkins, 12:08
Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Dave CROCKER, 11:26
Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Dave CROCKER, 11:17
Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Michael Adkins, 11:14
Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Michael Adkins, 10:57
[ietf-dkim] Urgent: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10 and RFC 5451, Barry Leiba, 09:51
Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Dave CROCKER, 03:42

May 27, 2009

Re: [ietf-dkim] On the Selector, J.D. Falk, 17:50
Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Michael Adkins, 17:02
Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Dave CROCKER, 12:32
Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Bill.Oxley, 12:09
Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Al Iverson, 11:50
Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Franck Martin, 07:21
Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 01:17
Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Franck Martin, 00:51

May 26, 2009

Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Steve Atkins, 23:47
Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 23:42
Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Franck Martin, 23:18
Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Steve Atkins, 20:54
Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 20:44
Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 20:40
Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Franck Martin, 20:25
Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Franck Martin, 20:19
Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 19:53
Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Steve Atkins, 19:11
[ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Franck Martin, 18:40
Re: [ietf-dkim] On the Selector, Douglas Otis, 10:53

May 25, 2009

Re: [ietf-dkim] On the Selector, Dave CROCKER, 23:01
Re: [ietf-dkim] On the Selector, Steve Atkins, 22:17
Re: [ietf-dkim] On the Selector, Franck Martin, 20:51
Re: [ietf-dkim] On the Selector, Dave CROCKER, 19:38
Re: [ietf-dkim] On the Selector, Steve Atkins, 19:20
Re: [ietf-dkim] On the Selector, Franck Martin, 19:09
Re: [ietf-dkim] On the Selector, Steve Atkins, 18:50
Re: [ietf-dkim] On the Selector, Dave CROCKER, 17:53
Re: [ietf-dkim] On the Selector, Franck Martin, 17:27
Re: [ietf-dkim] On the Selector, Dave CROCKER, 16:31
[ietf-dkim] On the Selector, Franck Martin, 16:24
Re: [ietf-dkim] A question about public key formats, John Levine, 10:05
[ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-05.txt, Internet-Drafts, 10:02
Re: [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary, John Levine, 09:09
Re: [ietf-dkim] A question about public key formats, John Levine, 08:09
Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Charles Lindsey, 07:36

May 23, 2009

Re: [ietf-dkim] let's screw up a good thing, Hector Santos, 15:28
Re: [ietf-dkim] let's screw up a good thing, Hector Santos, 15:13
Re: [ietf-dkim] let's screw up a good thing, Dave CROCKER, 15:01
Re: [ietf-dkim] let's screw up a good thing, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 13:54
Re: [ietf-dkim] let's screw up a good thing, Hector Santos, 08:04
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, John Levine, 02:44
[ietf-dkim] A question about public key formats, Steve Atkins, 02:29

May 22, 2009

Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Doug Otis, 21:10
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, John Levine, 20:34
Re: [ietf-dkim] let's screw up a good thing, Wietse Venema, 20:02
Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Doug Otis, 17:44
[ietf-dkim] let's screw up a good thing, Michael Thomas, 17:39
Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Michael Thomas, 17:26
[ietf-dkim] AUTO: Jill Resnick is out of the office. (returning 05/26/2009), Jill . Resnick, 16:49
Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, J.D. Falk, 16:04
[ietf-dkim] evangelizing dkim, Dave CROCKER, 15:55
Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Wietse Venema, 15:41
Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Doug Otis, 15:37
Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, J.D. Falk, 14:44
Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, J.D. Falk, 13:40
Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Douglas Otis, 12:39
[ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Eliot Lear, 09:57
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Charles Lindsey, 09:42
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, John R. Levine, 08:24
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Eliot Lear, 07:58
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, John R. Levine, 07:05
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Douglas Otis, 05:29
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Eliot Lear, 01:36

May 21, 2009

Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, John Levine, 19:44
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Hector Santos, 17:50
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Wietse Venema, 17:26
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Bill.Oxley, 15:20
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Douglas Otis, 15:10
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Eliot Lear, 13:51
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Hector Santos, 13:45
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Michael Thomas, 12:21
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Hector Santos, 12:16
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Dave CROCKER, 12:11
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Eliot Lear, 12:02
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Dave CROCKER, 11:50
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Eliot Lear, 11:28
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Dave CROCKER, 10:49
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Eliot Lear, 09:25
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Eliot Lear, 09:21
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Charles Lindsey, 06:22

May 20, 2009

Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Hector Santos, 21:29
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, SM, 21:04
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Douglas Otis, 20:29
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Michael Thomas, 19:57
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Steve Atkins, 19:50
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Michael Thomas, 19:35
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Steve Atkins, 19:17
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Michael Thomas, 19:00
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Michael Thomas, 18:50
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Steve Atkins, 18:46
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Murray S. Kucherawy, 18:22
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Michael Thomas, 17:56
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Steve Atkins, 17:37
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Dave CROCKER, 17:33
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Michael Thomas, 17:26
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Steve Atkins, 17:14
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Douglas Otis, 15:48
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Dave CROCKER, 13:00

May 19, 2009

Re: [ietf-dkim] To meet, or not, in Stockholm, Michael Thomas, 21:48
Re: [ietf-dkim] To meet, or not, in Stockholm, Dave CROCKER, 09:48
Re: [ietf-dkim] To meet, or not, in Stockholm, Barry Leiba, 09:39

May 12, 2009

[ietf-dkim] IETF Last Call summary for draft-ietf-dkim-overview, Pasi(_dot_)Eronen(_at_)nokia(_dot_)com, 04:03

May 11, 2009

[ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10.txt, Internet-Drafts, 17:45
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Hector Santos, 16:21
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Douglas Otis, 14:21
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Douglas Otis, 13:55
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:49
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, J.D. Falk, 13:43
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Murray S. Kucherawy, 11:56
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Steve Atkins, 11:50
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Eliot Lear, 11:33
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Steve Atkins, 11:16
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, John Levine, 10:02
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Charles Lindsey, 07:40
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, John Levine, 04:38
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Eliot Lear, 04:15
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Murray S. Kucherawy, 01:55
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Dave CROCKER, 01:25
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Dave CROCKER, 01:22
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Murray S. Kucherawy, 01:08
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Murray S. Kucherawy, 00:59
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Murray S. Kucherawy, 00:54
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Dave CROCKER, 00:41

May 10, 2009

Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Siegel, Ellen, 19:46
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Hector Santos, 09:37
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Hector Santos, 09:25
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 03:25
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Eliot Lear, 03:15
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Dave CROCKER, 02:31
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Eliot Lear, 02:10

May 09, 2009

Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Mark Delany, 23:49
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Hector Santos, 22:58
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered: sha1 vs sha256, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 22:14
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Hector Santos, 21:59
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered: sha1 vs sha256, Tony Hansen, 21:54
[ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Steve Atkins, 16:11
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 15:26
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Michael Thomas, 14:57
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Steve Atkins, 13:21
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Dave CROCKER, 13:11
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Steve Atkins, 13:06
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Wietse Venema, 12:47
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Hector Santos, 11:51

May 08, 2009

Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, John Levine, 21:05
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 19:46
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Steve Atkins, 18:49
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Michael Thomas, 17:30
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Douglas Otis, 16:50
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Stephen Farrell, 15:38
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Jim Fenton, 13:41
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Michael Thomas, 12:27
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Dave CROCKER, 11:29
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Eliot Lear, 05:35
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Dave CROCKER, 01:11

May 07, 2009

Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Jim Fenton, 20:49

May 06, 2009

Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Douglas Otis, 12:48
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Dave CROCKER, 12:11
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Eliot Lear, 12:09
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Dave CROCKER, 11:55

May 05, 2009

Re: [ietf-dkim] The "real" (remaining) errata, Pasi.Eronen, 08:17

May 04, 2009

Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Barry Leiba, 22:37
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Michael Thomas, 20:20
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Jeff Macdonald, 15:59
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Jeff Macdonald, 15:54
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Eliot Lear, 15:30
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Michael Thomas, 14:29
Re: [ietf-dkim] Lingering discussion on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, J.D. Falk, 14:25
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, J.D. Falk, 14:21
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, John Levine, 09:36
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 06:28
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Eliot Lear, 05:11

May 02, 2009

Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Tony Hansen, 00:16

May 01, 2009

Re: [ietf-dkim] Lingering discussion on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Doug Otis, 18:13
Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Michael Thomas, 16:27
Re: [ietf-dkim] The "real" (remaining) errata, Barry Leiba, 14:55
Re: [ietf-dkim] Lingering discussion on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Barry Leiba, 14:49
Re: [ietf-dkim] The "real" (remaining) errata, Doug Otis, 13:32
Re: [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing, Al Iverson, 12:16
[ietf-dkim] The "real" (remaining) errata, Barry Leiba, 12:09
[ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Barry Leiba, 12:06
[ietf-dkim] To meet, or not, in Stockholm, Barry Leiba, 11:58
Re: [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing, Barry Leiba, 11:52