IETF DKIM (date)
May 30, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] who's using l=, John Levine, 20:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- SHA1 support, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond, 19:29
- [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-overview-12.txt, Internet-Drafts, 13:49
- [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- other features, Dave CROCKER, 13:44
- [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- SHA1 support, Dave CROCKER, 13:40
- [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- t=y: Domain is testing DKIM, Dave CROCKER, 13:34
- [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type, Dave CROCKER, 13:31
- [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- h: Acceptable hash algorithms, Dave CROCKER, 13:25
- [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- z: Copied header fields, Dave CROCKER, 13:20
- [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- x: Signature expiration, Dave CROCKER, 13:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Dave CROCKER, 13:12
May 29, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary, Douglas Otis, 20:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Franck Martin, 18:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Michael Thomas, 18:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary, John R. Levine, 17:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Tony Hansen, 16:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary, Michael Thomas, 13:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Urgent: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10 and RFC 5451, Jeff Macdonald, 12:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Urgent: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10 and RFC 5451, MH Michael Hammer \(5304\), 12:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Urgent: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10 and RFC 5451, Siegel, Ellen, 11:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary, Barry Leiba, 09:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 08:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Florian Sager, 04:07
May 28, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Douglas Otis, 21:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, J.D. Falk, 20:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary, John R. Levine, 18:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Urgent: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10 and RFC 5451, Jim Fenton, 17:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Franck Martin, 16:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Michael Adkins, 16:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Barry Leiba, 16:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Urgent: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10 and RFC 5451, J.D. Falk, 15:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Franck Martin, 15:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Jeff Macdonald, 15:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Doug Otis, 15:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Michael Adkins, 15:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Urgent: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10 and RFC 5451, Murray S. Kucherawy, 15:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Franck Martin, 14:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Barry Leiba, 12:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary, Barry Leiba, 12:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Steve Atkins, 12:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Michael Adkins, 12:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Michael Adkins, 12:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Dave CROCKER, 11:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Dave CROCKER, 11:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Michael Adkins, 11:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Michael Adkins, 10:57
- [ietf-dkim] Urgent: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10 and RFC 5451, Barry Leiba, 09:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Dave CROCKER, 03:42
May 27, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] On the Selector, J.D. Falk, 17:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Michael Adkins, 17:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Dave CROCKER, 12:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Bill.Oxley, 12:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Al Iverson, 11:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Franck Martin, 07:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 01:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Franck Martin, 00:51
May 26, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Steve Atkins, 23:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 23:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Franck Martin, 23:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Steve Atkins, 20:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 20:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 20:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Franck Martin, 20:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Franck Martin, 20:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 19:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Steve Atkins, 19:11
- [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM, Franck Martin, 18:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] On the Selector, Douglas Otis, 10:53
May 25, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] On the Selector, Dave CROCKER, 23:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] On the Selector, Steve Atkins, 22:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] On the Selector, Franck Martin, 20:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] On the Selector, Dave CROCKER, 19:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] On the Selector, Steve Atkins, 19:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] On the Selector, Franck Martin, 19:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] On the Selector, Steve Atkins, 18:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] On the Selector, Dave CROCKER, 17:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] On the Selector, Franck Martin, 17:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] On the Selector, Dave CROCKER, 16:31
- [ietf-dkim] On the Selector, Franck Martin, 16:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A question about public key formats, John Levine, 10:05
- [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-05.txt, Internet-Drafts, 10:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary, John Levine, 09:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A question about public key formats, John Levine, 08:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Charles Lindsey, 07:36
May 23, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] let's screw up a good thing, Hector Santos, 15:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] let's screw up a good thing, Hector Santos, 15:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] let's screw up a good thing, Dave CROCKER, 15:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] let's screw up a good thing, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 13:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] let's screw up a good thing, Hector Santos, 08:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, John Levine, 02:44
- [ietf-dkim] A question about public key formats, Steve Atkins, 02:29
May 22, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Doug Otis, 21:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, John Levine, 20:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] let's screw up a good thing, Wietse Venema, 20:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Doug Otis, 17:44
- [ietf-dkim] let's screw up a good thing, Michael Thomas, 17:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Michael Thomas, 17:26
- [ietf-dkim] AUTO: Jill Resnick is out of the office. (returning 05/26/2009), Jill . Resnick, 16:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, J.D. Falk, 16:04
- [ietf-dkim] evangelizing dkim, Dave CROCKER, 15:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Wietse Venema, 15:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Doug Otis, 15:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, J.D. Falk, 14:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, J.D. Falk, 13:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Douglas Otis, 12:39
- [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it, Eliot Lear, 09:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Charles Lindsey, 09:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, John R. Levine, 08:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Eliot Lear, 07:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, John R. Levine, 07:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Douglas Otis, 05:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Eliot Lear, 01:36
May 21, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, John Levine, 19:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Hector Santos, 17:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Wietse Venema, 17:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Bill.Oxley, 15:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Douglas Otis, 15:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Eliot Lear, 13:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Hector Santos, 13:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Michael Thomas, 12:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Hector Santos, 12:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Dave CROCKER, 12:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Eliot Lear, 12:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Dave CROCKER, 11:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Eliot Lear, 11:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Dave CROCKER, 10:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Eliot Lear, 09:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Eliot Lear, 09:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Charles Lindsey, 06:22
May 20, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Hector Santos, 21:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, SM, 21:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Douglas Otis, 20:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Michael Thomas, 19:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Steve Atkins, 19:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Michael Thomas, 19:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Steve Atkins, 19:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Michael Thomas, 19:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Michael Thomas, 18:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Steve Atkins, 18:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Murray S. Kucherawy, 18:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Michael Thomas, 17:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Steve Atkins, 17:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Dave CROCKER, 17:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Michael Thomas, 17:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Steve Atkins, 17:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Douglas Otis, 15:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Dave CROCKER, 13:00
May 19, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] To meet, or not, in Stockholm, Michael Thomas, 21:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] To meet, or not, in Stockholm, Dave CROCKER, 09:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] To meet, or not, in Stockholm, Barry Leiba, 09:39
May 11, 2009
- [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10.txt, Internet-Drafts, 17:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Hector Santos, 16:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Douglas Otis, 14:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Douglas Otis, 13:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, J.D. Falk, 13:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Murray S. Kucherawy, 11:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Steve Atkins, 11:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Eliot Lear, 11:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Steve Atkins, 11:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, John Levine, 10:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Charles Lindsey, 07:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, John Levine, 04:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Eliot Lear, 04:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Murray S. Kucherawy, 01:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Dave CROCKER, 01:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Dave CROCKER, 01:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Murray S. Kucherawy, 01:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Murray S. Kucherawy, 00:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Murray S. Kucherawy, 00:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Dave CROCKER, 00:41
May 10, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Siegel, Ellen, 19:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Hector Santos, 09:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Hector Santos, 09:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 03:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Eliot Lear, 03:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Dave CROCKER, 02:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Eliot Lear, 02:10
May 09, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Mark Delany, 23:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Hector Santos, 22:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered: sha1 vs sha256, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 22:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Hector Santos, 21:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered: sha1 vs sha256, Tony Hansen, 21:54
- [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Steve Atkins, 16:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 15:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Michael Thomas, 14:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Steve Atkins, 13:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Dave CROCKER, 13:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Steve Atkins, 13:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Wietse Venema, 12:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Hector Santos, 11:51
May 08, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, John Levine, 21:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 19:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Steve Atkins, 18:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Michael Thomas, 17:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Douglas Otis, 16:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Stephen Farrell, 15:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Jim Fenton, 13:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Michael Thomas, 12:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Dave CROCKER, 11:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Eliot Lear, 05:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Dave CROCKER, 01:11
May 04, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Barry Leiba, 22:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Michael Thomas, 20:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Jeff Macdonald, 15:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Jeff Macdonald, 15:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Eliot Lear, 15:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Michael Thomas, 14:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Lingering discussion on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, J.D. Falk, 14:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, J.D. Falk, 14:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, John Levine, 09:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 06:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Eliot Lear, 05:11
May 01, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Lingering discussion on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Doug Otis, 18:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Michael Thomas, 16:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The "real" (remaining) errata, Barry Leiba, 14:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Lingering discussion on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Barry Leiba, 14:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The "real" (remaining) errata, Doug Otis, 13:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing, Al Iverson, 12:16
- [ietf-dkim] The "real" (remaining) errata, Barry Leiba, 12:09
- [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?, Barry Leiba, 12:06
- [ietf-dkim] To meet, or not, in Stockholm, Barry Leiba, 11:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing, Barry Leiba, 11:52