On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 03:53:11PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Eliot Lear <lear(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com> wrote:
I'd like to break these into two points:
1. On whether to do rfc4871bis at all
-bis - yes. Definitely.
2. On whether to move to draft standard
While I was initially in favor of this, I am now uncomfortable doing so,
based on the lengthy debate we just concluded about errata. To me the
Qualified approval based on consensus gained in the -bis draft.
If I understand Suresh correctly, that the Standard draft would be based on
bis, +1.
--
Jeff Macdonald
jmacdonald(_at_)e-dialog(_dot_)com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html