I'm certainly ready to move forward with 4871bis. Yes, the protocol is
ready to go to Draft Standard. No, we do not need another cycle at
Proposed Standard. I think there's enough energy in the group to get
4871bis through.
As to why bother, with 16 errata to pore through, I feel that it is much
better to have one place to look for the technical spec instead of 17
documents.
Tony
Barry Leiba wrote:
This is the promised seed for 4871bis discussion. Is the group ready
to move ahead with that? Is the DKIM signing protocol ready to go to
Draft Standard? Is there an update needed, with another cycle at
Proposed Standard? Is there energy in the group to follow a 4871bis
effort through?
Please discuss this here, with the goal of deciding -- within the next
couple of weeks -- whether we should request a meeting slot in
Stockholm.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html