ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?

2009-05-04 15:54:01
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 09:26:15PM +0200, Eliot Lear wrote:
On 5/4/09 9:17 PM, Jeff Macdonald wrote:
2.  On whether to move to draft standard

While I was initially in favor of this, I am now uncomfortable 
doing so,
based on the lengthy debate we just concluded about errata.  To me the

Qualified approval based on consensus gained in the -bis draft.


If I understand Suresh correctly, that the Standard draft would be  
based on
bis, +1.

Confusion has set in.  One moves to draft standard when the proposed  
standard has been stable for at least six months.  Given that we just  
essentially updated it, we can't possibly claim that.

I wasn't under the impression that these were happening at the same
time. So, yes, maybe I'm confused.


-- 
Jeff Macdonald
jmacdonald(_at_)e-dialog(_dot_)com

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html