ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?

2009-05-06 12:09:33
Dave,

Although it seems that I'm on the other side of the issue from Jim, I'm 
don't think the below is quite fair.

On 5/6/09 5:50 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
And just to keep things real, can you cite some examples of the effect you are
concerned about?
   

If we accept the existing dogma that draft indicates "more stable" and 
that Proposed indicates "less", then Jim shouldn't have to answer the 
above question because he is operating under that dogma.  That's a more 
fundamental debate that should take place elsewhere (and has, to no 
one's benefit).

Eliot
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html